<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5:00 Shadow, 7:30 Meeting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamjcopeland.com/2007/12/07/500-shadow-730-meeting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamjcopeland.com/2007/12/07/500-shadow-730-meeting/</link>
	<description>Adam J. Copeland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 14:19:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: real live preacher</title>
		<link>http://www.adamjcopeland.com/2007/12/07/500-shadow-730-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>real live preacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamcopeland.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/500-shadow-730-meeting/#comment-473</guid>
		<description>I say, shave in the morning and let it go at that. If that&#039;s not enough for someone in the church, well....it needs to be enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say, shave in the morning and let it go at that. If that&#8217;s not enough for someone in the church, well&#8230;.it needs to be enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.adamjcopeland.com/2007/12/07/500-shadow-730-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 16:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamcopeland.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/500-shadow-730-meeting/#comment-472</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment on my blog, will read the Princeton obituary... and I agree the Herald&#039;s lack of geography also shocking!!

Laughed at the shoes thing (although from September to April I wear my cowboy boots... so that problem goes away, except for funerals) and this, although being blonde girlie it doesn&#039;t apply!! Am off to read what you say about the clergy collar though as this is a &#039;live&#039; debate for me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment on my blog, will read the Princeton obituary&#8230; and I agree the Herald&#8217;s lack of geography also shocking!!</p>
<p>Laughed at the shoes thing (although from September to April I wear my cowboy boots&#8230; so that problem goes away, except for funerals) and this, although being blonde girlie it doesn&#8217;t apply!! Am off to read what you say about the clergy collar though as this is a &#8216;live&#8217; debate for me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Bancroft</title>
		<link>http://www.adamjcopeland.com/2007/12/07/500-shadow-730-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-471</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Bancroft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 16:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamcopeland.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/500-shadow-730-meeting/#comment-471</guid>
		<description>Just clicked over here from the comment on Renderings.  Good to know that other pastors struggle with issues of wardrobe and grooming.  I&#039;d say to let the 5:00 shadow be what it is.  If anyone mentions it, make a claim for saving water or something like that.  I think that most people have more on their minds than whether the pastor has a 5:00 shadow at an evening meeting.  If they do spend the meeting thinking about that, well, there are some issues there.  I also think there&#039;s an argument to be made that we don&#039;t do anyone any favors by always presenting ourselves as perfect and totally put together.  I think we&#039;re a generation that&#039;s redefining the pastorate as more down-to-earth, common man/woman type people.  We aren&#039;t our parents and that&#039;s OK.

Peace-Alan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just clicked over here from the comment on Renderings.  Good to know that other pastors struggle with issues of wardrobe and grooming.  I&#8217;d say to let the 5:00 shadow be what it is.  If anyone mentions it, make a claim for saving water or something like that.  I think that most people have more on their minds than whether the pastor has a 5:00 shadow at an evening meeting.  If they do spend the meeting thinking about that, well, there are some issues there.  I also think there&#8217;s an argument to be made that we don&#8217;t do anyone any favors by always presenting ourselves as perfect and totally put together.  I think we&#8217;re a generation that&#8217;s redefining the pastorate as more down-to-earth, common man/woman type people.  We aren&#8217;t our parents and that&#8217;s OK.</p>
<p>Peace-Alan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McMoustache</title>
		<link>http://www.adamjcopeland.com/2007/12/07/500-shadow-730-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>McMoustache</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 15:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamcopeland.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/500-shadow-730-meeting/#comment-470</guid>
		<description>have you considered simply reducing the surface area to be shaved? perhaps by growing a glorious stache like mine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have you considered simply reducing the surface area to be shaved? perhaps by growing a glorious stache like mine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah</title>
		<link>http://www.adamjcopeland.com/2007/12/07/500-shadow-730-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamcopeland.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/500-shadow-730-meeting/#comment-469</guid>
		<description>although perhaps i am a cumnock dirtball of the simpleton variety, i would duly note that the probablity that a certain revolutionary carpenter from nazareth sported a form of facial hair fashion is quite high.  one might argue cultural relativity within a particular historical construct, etc. is/are the cause(s) for such a Palestinian hair folicle fascade, however i say: j.c. is eternal.  thus, it follows (to use a philosophical employment), so is the beard.  grow it.  groom it.  become great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>although perhaps i am a cumnock dirtball of the simpleton variety, i would duly note that the probablity that a certain revolutionary carpenter from nazareth sported a form of facial hair fashion is quite high.  one might argue cultural relativity within a particular historical construct, etc. is/are the cause(s) for such a Palestinian hair folicle fascade, however i say: j.c. is eternal.  thus, it follows (to use a philosophical employment), so is the beard.  grow it.  groom it.  become great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
