10

Would Jesus Twitter?

1097848_world_button

I’ve been in several conversations and meetings lately about technology, social-networking, blogs, and, well, PR. No, “PR” is probably not the best descriptor because these folks are interested not just in public perception, but in how they can best use existing technologies to connect people and ideas for the betterment of all — if that’s what PR is, my apologies. I love to think and talk about such things, but I’m also aware that my English and Religion degrees only go so far in equipping me for the conversation. Here’s what I’ve been thinking, though.

My generation is connected to each other in ways unseen twenty years ago. For example, Megan and I had coffee with some good friends a few weeks ago. It was a great hour and a half, and I look forward to getting together again soon. But I probably won’t see them for a few more weeks. Yesterday, though, I saw they uploaded pictures of a new dog and asked for name suggestions via a facebook status. I added my two cents and by doing so, checked in with them and shared in their fun news. Somehow, via a facebook interaction or two, our friendship is strengthened, or at least positively continued, through a few clicks on facebook. I could give plenty of other examples, or even list friends who I feel fairly close to and been conversing with for over a year, but who I met through the blog and have never met in person. After spending a year abroad and now returning to Decatur with some friends having moved away, I’m particularly aware of how technology has enhanced friendships in ways unavailable before.

Networks such as facebook, and facts like youth these days are spending more time online and less time watching TV, are changing our culture pretty darn quickly. Remember when PalmPilots were all the rage and tablet laptops were the next big thing? Remember when our children just hung out at friends’ houses rather than setting up “playdates?”

So I wonder how the church needs to change in such a world, and I wonder how Christians can best live into the web 2.0 world and beyond.

Sure there’s plenty of cautious questions to ask: are online encounters cutting down on in-person ones? How do we follow an incarnate savior in a virtual world? Are the tech gaps between generations alienating our most seasoned members? And many more.

I just signed up for Twitter (@ajc123) as I’m definitely of the “don’t knock it until you’ve tried it school of technology.” Day one is going fine after I figured out how to reply to people (they should put the shortcuts in the welcome email).

In seminary I’ll often hear stuff like, God’s great movements always begin on the margins of society or, be suspicious wherever there is empire for the resounding message of the Bible is against empire and for God’s subversive acts. So I wonder, is new technology the margins, the periphery, or just empire?

If it’s the margins, should we be starting up new church developments in Second Life? If it’s empire, should we even email?

I’m not sure, but I do know that the resistance I hear to much technological change sounds an awful lot like the resistance I hear to good and right changes in the church: but we’ve never done it that way before. The resistance sounds an awful lot like fear of change rather than excitement for new possibilities for living-out the gospel.

I’m not sure if I’ll like Twitter. I’m not sure how long I’ll blog. But I’ll end with a story I heard last week. A friend of mine was at a church service in Atlanta where she met a visitor. After welcoming the visitor, she asked how she heard about the congregation. The visitor said she was surfing the web angry about crappy old hymns and not wanting to have anything to do with the church. She googled and found my blog where she found the presbymergent.org link. She followed that and ended up visiting an emergent congregation in Atlanta.

I have no idea who this visitor was. Never met her. Probably never will. It goes to show, though, that Holy Spirit has no qualms about moving online. Maybe we shouldn’t either.

image by ilker

EmailShare
  1. George Tatro says:

    00001000011100010100010001000100010000100001000111111000111

    This is Twitter 3.4. This is the normal progression of things isn’t it? We go from blogging, to Facebook “George is………..”, to Twittering, to Twitter 3.4 which is putting all our thoughts into binary code.

    Wendall Berry doesn’t have a computer; I guess his thoughts are not worth exploring.
    Thomas Merton hasn’t been published in binary; how can I discover my spirituality?

    What we have here is a Presbymergency! Presbymergency is a word I coined to express my deep distress over the desire of many of our young people in ministry who unwittingly disenfranchise the old, poor, homeless, computerless, and technologically inclined through electronic communication and thereby have moved from the periphery right off the deep end and into the abyss.

    My fear is not that I will have a profound spiritual experience from a twitter or blog that I read, and have my world turned upside down. (I do have that fear about snake handling preachers on Sand Mountain and for that reason refuse to take up snakes.) But I find that real relationships cannot be sustained in any meaningful way when mediated through electronic devices and with the end times coming and all that I don’t think that we should be so dependant on electricity anyway!

    I invite anybody who has comment to come on over to my blog where the Marquis de Queensbury rules do not apply and I will tell them how 0001001100011110100111001100111001100110100.

    Peace

  2. In answer to the question: No. You can’t tell an effective parable about the kingdom twittering. You can’t present a symbolically nuanced vision of your incarnation of the good news twittering. That pretty much rules out the Gospels.

    That doesn’t mean it’s a bad thing for his followers. But our Man in Nazareth just wasn’t quite as ADD as we are.

  3. [...] 1.) Blogger and seminary student, Adam Copeland, enters the world of twitter. Quite thoughtfully I might add. [...]

  4. I hear you David. Though he did seem to travel all the time, so maybe more ADD than we might first think.

  5. George Tatro says:

    Jesus was traveling all the time because people wanted to kill him….now I suppose you will suggest that he was paranoid. My Lord and Saviour was not ADD, ADHD, Paranoid Schizophrenic, or suffering from any other mental illness. People were really trying to kill him as evidenced by the fact that they did. The Green Bible says it, I believe it, that settles it!
    Peace out Scottish Soldier for Christ,
    St. G

  6. miguelote says:

    amen georgie, i look forward to hearing more of your wisdom on your blog and your facebook page

  7. Marci says:

    While I haven’t had a taste of the Twitter koolaid yet, I do think that we should be intentional about how the church enters into electronic spaces.
    People who are coming to visit our church have different reasons. Occasionally someone will say they found our website and came to worship because of that. Last week, we had visitors who had read about our church in the newspaper (how 19th century!). Most often, however, people come visit our church because they are specifically invited by people who are already active in the church.

    Preach the gospel at all times. If necessary, use words. Didn’t Augustine say that? I’m not so good with quotes. Wonder how that quote might change in the 21st century?

  8. miguelote says:

    it’s usually credited to st. francis of assisi

  9. Would Jesus Twitter? Here’s my answer, at least during Holy Week.

    Grace and Peace,
    Raffi