Teaching Matters: Down with Learning Objectives

Defining Targets Differently by Frits Ahlefeldt-Laurvig

Sometimes I can get a bit contradictory, not with any beautifully reasoned argument, but because it just feels right. Ever since I started teaching I’ve always had a skeptical view of the very foundation of most college courses: learning objectives.

Until recently, I’d be happy to go off on learning objectives (LOs) without any very nuanced reason why. Now, finally, I think I’ve found a way to articulate my contradictory point of view.

To begin, I suppose I should make it clear that I’m not exactly against LOs. I mean, I support learning. Huge fan, in fact. And, yes, I think teaching and learning should be approached with some sort of particularity. I appreciate the need to be able to assess learning, and that such assessment is difficult (impossible?) to do well without clearly defined LOs. Duly noted.

Next, for the uninitiated, learning objectives usually appear near the top of a course syllabus (or some other learning document). They articulate what students should know or be able to demonstrate at the end of a course or lesson. The trick is keeping LOs rightly balanced between being too specific and too broad. Plus, they should be able to be assessed or measured in some way (more here, here, and here).

So far so good. Over the years, in my contradictory way I did enunciate some small-scale concerns about the magical learning objective. For instance:

  • Learning objectives rarely take into account the different starting points of students.
  • Learning objectives can confine, limiting openness to exploring unexpected areas of concern that develop as a course is taught.
  • Learning objectives can seem to undercut learning for learning’s sake. What of the love of learning itself (very hard to measure)?
  • Learning objectives, in faculty workshops, take up too much faculty energy considering how to write the damn things instead of, actually, how to teach well.
  • Learning objectives privilege the instructor’s concerns over those of the students.

For these reasons and more, I’ve come to sometimes hiding learning objectives in the appendix of my course syllabi. Instead, I have a section up front headed, “Some areas we’ll cover include…” My learning objectives exist, they just mostly hangout backstage.

But this is all small ball. Finally, I think I’ve found a way to articulate my larger annoyance with LOs. To explain, I need to make a connection to organizational leadership.

In organizational planning processes, orgs will often develop mission statements with (albeit general) objectives. For example, here’s the mission statement of Westminster Presbyterian Church in Minneapolis:

In response to the grace of God through Jesus Christ, Westminster’s mission is to:

  • proclaim and celebrate the Good News of Jesus Christ;
  • gather as an open community to worship God with dignity and joy, warmth and beauty;
  • nourish personal faith through study, prayer, and fellowship;
  • work for love, peace and justice;
  • be a welcoming and caring Christian community, witnessing to God’s love day by day;
  • work locally and beyond with our denomination and the larger Christian Church; and
  • be a telling presence in the city.

Yes, learning objectives and mission statements are far from exact replicates, but they do both describe the main purpose of an organization. They both provide focus. They both indicate the direction of the organization.

Considering mission statements and learning objectives together, however, alerted me to my main concern, the one I hadn’t ever been able to articulate: learning objectives lack values. Well, of course they have values in that everything is value-laden, but typical learning objectives describe what, by the end of a course, students will be able to do. Typically, LOs don’t describe how students will get there. They describe the destination without revealing anything about the journey.

And, as for me and my class, the journey is the whole point! If learning objectives are like a mission statement, what’s missing is the learning values statement. What’s missing is the process by which the learning community will grow together. What’s missing is how the class will accomplish its learning.

At the end of the day, I’m just as—if not more—concerned about the learning community we develop, about the love for learning we foster, about the empathy we gain, about the neighbors we love, about the laughter we share, about the questions we raise, and about the souls we cherish as I am about the predictable, measurable LOs we meet.

I’m sure there’s probably some way to mold LOs to suggest values and teaching style, but that’s not really my point. If LOs are supposed to key students into what a class is about, I contend a class is about the experience created and the values lived-out more than what’s actually read, tested, and memorized. By heading our syllabi with LOs we’re already leading students astray.

I close with a story. Back when I was in seminary, I remember the day when the eminent Walter Brueggemann guest lectured in my Old Testament course. Students had heard many stories of Brueggemann, scholar unparalleled, man without an unpublished thought. So, obviously, we were taking notes of his lecture like stenographers on steroids. A few minutes in Brueggemann looked at us said something like, “I’m flattered, but you might as well stop taking notes. Chances are you’re never going to look at those notes once you graduate and are serving in ministry. Instead, look up. Engage with me here and now; what sticks is what matters.”

I hope to teach in a way in which what sticks is what truly matters. Put that on a syllabus and call it learning.

image by Frits Ahlefeldt-Laurvig

My Classroom is Not a Safe Space

Usually, it’s a man who says it. He wants conversation to go deeper. He’s hoping for more self-disclosure. With the best of intentions, he wants to move past the mundane. He desires this time to be different. So he says, “Go ahead. Share. This is a safe space.” Except, no it isn’t.

Continue

On a Student’s Right to Choose…Writing Assignments

It’s hard to imagine, but there’s only four weeks of spring semester left at Concordia College. Continuing my reflection series on my course Word to the Wise: Writing for Religious & Social Change, this post considers my approach to assignments and, more specifically, what students have had to say about the assignments they’ve selected and […]

Continue

Coming soon: A New Position with the Center for Stewardship Leaders

This announcement is last week’s news on Facebook and Twitter, but I realized I failed to share here on the blog. I’m excited to announce my appointment as the next Director of the Center for Stewardship Leaders at Luther Seminary in St. Paul, Minnesota. I’ll begin July 1. It will be an honor to work […]

Continue

When Faith Goes to College . . . And Joins the Wrestling Team

I have a post up today on the new Bearings blog of the new BTS Center. Teaser below, but head to the Bearings blog for the full post. Considering the amount of online commentary available concerning the millennial generation and the future of the church, the relative dearth of attention paid to young adults’ experience […]

Continue

No More “Volunteers” at Church

  Language matters. Particularly, the language we use in worship matters. So, my ears perked up recently when in worship congregation members were besieged by many, oh so many, opportunities to “volunteer.” Now I’m all for businesses giving their employees time off for volunteering. I’m all for helping people. I’m all for paying it forward. But […]

Continue

On My Love/Hate for Grading

Top among the activities I never quite feel like I get just right is grading. Grading student papers, to be exact. Here’s the thing: I’m perfectly comfortable giving feedback. I’m more than happy to respond with comments, hopefully helpful comments. But, that darn grade—whether a number, a letter, even a check/check plus—is always the worst. […]

Continue

From Generation to Generation, Lent 2

A short essay of mine is up this week at Huffington Post Religion, ON Scripture, Day1 and Sojourners. Entitled, “From Generation to Generation” it’s a commentary on Genesis 17:1-7, 15-16, the Old Testament lectionary reading for this coming Sunday, Lent II. I’ll post the intro below, and I invite you to click over to the other sites for the full piece. From Generation […]

Continue

Student writing gone public: blogging the classroom

In my Word to the Wise: Writing for Religious and Social Change course, students engage in two main types of writing assignments. First there’s Digital Writing Assignments, all of which they post on their personal blogs. Options include, for example: Write a post reflecting on a time you changed your mind. Record and post a video […]

Continue